Home » Archives for Jessica Ruprecht » Page 3

Author: Jessica Ruprecht

A faded summer’s day

The summer’s sunshine fades — sinking
into dusky pinks and gold that
glimmer into dusty motes which linger
in the air. Lazy, settling
floating, drifting until—

dis-rupted

by a curlicue of air that
reaches in through open window to stir
licking into the hazy swelter
of the room, still smothered by
the mid-day’s heat.

The breeze caresses, beckons.
Swirling dust motes into tendrils
like fingers: reaching, calling
in a drifting dance
to sway me from repose.

I linger at the window,
shimmer in the last golden ray
of rapidly fading day.
Linger as gold gives way to ochre, then
to rust. And then to dusky gray.

There’s night come swooping in my
open window. Her cold fingers rasp against
bared arms — raise goosebumps
and set me loose as I am

set adrift

tangled in the rush of cool air
that whispers in my window.

August 2014 Book Reviews

Can you believe it’s September already? Granted, I took a week off this month for a trip to Scotland, and it shows in both my monthly page count (1271) and the number of books I’ve finished. But, on the bright side, a month that passes quickly is usually a month well-spent:

Arthur’s Seat, Edinburgh
Loch Ness
Edinburgh Castle

So instead of fretting, I shall take refuge in what I did manage to accomplish this month, notably the completion of the following books:

Disclaimer: This post contains Amazon affiliate links. I make a (very) small referral commission from purchases made using my links. This does not affect your price.

[one_half]

 

 

[/one_half] [one_half_last]I finished reading Field Notes from a Catastrophe: Man, Nature, and Climate Change by Elizabeth Kolbert on the plane to Scotland. Climate change is a subject near and dear to my heart, and this book does a great job of being both readable and informative. The book provides a great overview of some of the more concerning recent research, interviews with many prominent climate scientists, and a compelling argument for why action to drastically reduce greenhouse gas emissions is critically important. If you’re feeling sanguine about Earth’s future then I highly recommend you check your delusions at the door and read this book.[/one_half_last]

 

[one_half]

 

 

 

[/one_half] [one_half_last]The second book I read this month was The Invention of Wings: A Novel by Sue Monk Kidd. I had previously read and enjoyed her earlier novel The Secret Life of Bees, but I think The Invention of Wings has the more compelling story. Set toward the beginnings of the American abolition movement in the early 1800’s, The Invention of Wings is based on the real story of two sisters, Sarah and Angelina Grimké, who were revolutionary early advocates of both abolition and women’s rights. Though based on real events, the narrative has been artfully fictionalized by Kidd, most notably in the inclusion of the perspective of a Grimké slave, Handful. Both a compelling story in its own right and a fascinating exploration of the lives of the Grimké sisters, this book would make an excellent addition to anyone’s reading list. [/one_half_last]

 

[one_half]

 

 

 

 

[/one_half] [one_half_last]I Thought It Was Just Me (but it isn’t): Making the Journey from “What Will People Think?” to “I Am Enough” marks the last volume in the trifecta of Brené Brown’s books. I had previously read and loved her most recent book, Daring Greatly, and then was subsequently unimpressed by her second book The Gifts of Imperfection, mostly due to it’s similarity to Daring Greatly (see my earlier review). However, I was pleasantly surprised by I Thought It Was Just Me (but it isn’t).

The first of her published works, this book focuses more intensely on the results of her early research on shame (primarily in women), and I found the more in-depth treatment to be both fresh and insightful. Unlike The Gifts of Imperfection, I thought this was a great book and one that makes an excellent companion to Daring Greatly. FYI: the focus of the book is nearly entirely on shame in women, though brief mention of shame for men is made toward the end.[/one_half_last]

I’d love to hear from you! Let me know what you’re reading in the comments below.

Tired of waiting for my monthly wrap-ups? I talk about what I’m reading each week in my email newsletter.

When you talk to me like that

Your voice crawls 
from your throat like a monster 
with too many eyes and legs 
and it's

unexpected.


I'm trapped.


I'm         choking on your anger, 
dissolving in the 
thunderclap
that issues from your throat.

The certainty of entrapment eviscerates 
me as your tirade empties 
me out and then shakes 
me back up and leaves 
me quivering 

in the echoing vacuum that 
follows the crack 
of your voice like rope

when you talk to me 
like that.

Why you shouldn’t be afraid to publish writing that sucks

One of the realities writers have to face is this: you will write and even publish things that suck.

It’s a truth I’ve had to come to terms with as I’ve started publishing my poetry and writings online. Before I started posting things I was safe: since no one ever read my words, their suckiness (or lack thereof) was effectively irrelevant. Instead, the only thing that really mattered was how much a particular piece of writing amused me, or how much I had enjoyed the process of creating it.

As I’ve started publishing my words online, I’ve had to think more carefully about what it means if I post things that I perceive as fundamentally flawed. My conclusion: it’s more dangerous to let fear of failure paralyze you than to occasionally post writing that sucks.

The dirty secret that means it’s ok to suck

Actually, there are two secrets:

  1. Suckiness is subjective.
  2. Suckiness is a variable function of time, mood, and context.

What I think is the greatest poem ever isn’t going to do it for everyone else. The important thing is to remember that that’s just life and that it’s ok. Not every poem is going to rock the world. Nor should every poem do so. (Or else we’d be in for one very bumpy ride…)

The poem that I read and loved on a particular sunny Saturday may not do it for me on a subsequent gloomy Tuesday. That’s ok too. Sometimes you pick up a book and just can’t get into it, only to pick it up two years later and find it irresistibly compelling.

Our tastes change to suit our needs, and those are forever changing as a function of time.

Take with you whatever is of greatest value right in this particular moment.

So, what does this mean for writers?

At first, these features might sound like bad things, right?

The thought of people hating the words and ideas I’ve labored over is enough to send me to bed on a bad day, and the addendum that I may in fact have no control over other people’s thoughts can make that notion even scarier.

After all, we writers know our words inside out and upside down. We know each and every fragile sentence, with all its potential and its imperfections.

No one knows more clearly than the writer how painfully flawed the writing is.

As a writer I birth first the idea of the writing, and it’s perfect and shimmering and totally, inevitably unattainable. But it lives vividly in the mind that nonetheless I find myself compelled to try it out, to attempt to capture it’s unachievable splendor in ink and fiber, just knowing that it can never work out as well as you thought it could have.

But you still feel compelled to try.

I recently described the writing process to a friend as, “the ooky slog of watching your brilliant idea turn to ash as you attempt to render it in words on a page”.

I stand by my sentiments.

Writing is a process and it’s often an ugly, brutal one, a process that can leave the author feeling gutted, small, and incompetent. It’s a process that, inevitably, will lead to writing that sucks.

Instead of giving up, free yourself by embracing the promise of failure

I’m trying a new strategy with the content on this blog.

It’s not highly curated. I post it as it comes along and I’m not holding much back. I spend time on revisions, but I do it all myself. No one edits the work I post here but me.

And if you pay close attention you’ll notice that the pieces that show up here exist in a state of occasional flux.

Sometimes I come back later and work them over again. Sometimes the words change.

Because change is a part of the writing process. And the phrase that sang in the moment you penned it often falls hopelessly short upon re-reading.

But that’s just life, and it’s all fine.

This means it must be ok to post writing that sucks

The saving grace is that my worst poem may someday be the one that changes someone’s life.

There are far too many variables to ever hope to control for.

So I’m setting my failure free, and attempting instead to achieve only that which is deliciously imperfect.

Because what they’ve forgotten to tell us is that the road to greatness is paved, not with good intentions, but rather with uncountably many imperfections.

I invite you to join me.

Does embracing suckiness have the power to set you free? Let me know in the comments below!

As the city creeps towards midnight

The city creeps towards midnight becoming 
a raw, unfettered place,
a dark and dangerous place.

My footsteps echo, hurried over
cobblestones — pounding to the rhythm
of my too-fast beating heart.

I watch for the shadows of strangers
in the dim, orangey glow
of flickering streetlamps and passing headlights.

The city at midnight slips sideways into strangeness,
becomes a place only half-way real,
becomes a place in which the 
mouldering and abandoned spaces—
now marked only for demolition—
resuscitate
under the moon's cold scrutiny.

In the city at midnight my footsteps
tap dance to the hum
of the ghost-fiddler's tempo floating
past my eardrums on a breeze
echoing from a dark and dusty window.

In the city at midnight I walk
alone.